Enemies of Babri masjid can not be described as Hindu Right : People of Right hand are those in allegiance to the living kalki/imam e zamana

Using the word Right for any one requires allegiance test to the living successor of prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS which is mandatory for all souls wishing to enter SWARG/jannat/heaven. This letter to Dr. Ram Punyani has clear critique his describing the accursed enemies of Babri masjid as 'Hindu Right'. Looking at the clear MAHABHARATA code which is affirmed in Sura Kauthar, we are witness to the fate of all accursed duryodhans who deluded to rule by looting the assets of the cousins. So, RSS and BJP are currently among the accursed for looting the land of Babri masjid where muslimeen and muslimaat saluted the living kalki.  In the name of secular perspective, he is not describing muslimeen and muslimaat as those subject to unite in allegiance to the living all all awaiting acceptance of the living kalki. 

Instead of sharing more on the letter, I welcome you to read my letter which call for celebrating muslimeen and muslimaat as mercy for humanity provided they are pledged to the living successor of Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma.  

As per Google AI review, we get reference to the people of Right in the light of holy Qur'aan which Dr. Ram Punyani should be referring for making all understand the call of Allah through the living Imams of the age.

In the Quran, "people of the right" can refer to the "people of the right hand," who are the righteous individuals who will receive their record of deeds with their right hand in the afterlife, signifying a positive outcome. This righteousness is defined by living a life of obedience to God and upholding certain rights, such as those of parents, relatives, orphans, neighbors, and the needy. Conversely, the term also broadly describes individuals who follow a just path in this life, respecting the rights of all human beings, who are seen as created with dignity and the ability to choose between good and evil. [1, 2, 3]

The "people of the right hand" in the afterlife

• A righteous outcome: The phrase refers to those who are on God's right side in the afterlife, which indicates salvation and a positive final destination.
• Receiving the record of deeds: They will receive their book of deeds in their right hand, which is a sign of being from the people of Paradise. [2, 4, 5]

The characteristics of the righteous in this life

• Fulfilling rights: Individuals who are considered righteous are those who acknowledge and uphold the rights of others as outlined in the Quran. These rights include those of:
• Parents and relatives
• Orphans and the needy
• Neighbors (both near and far)
• Companions and travelers
• Those one has a responsibility over
• Respect for human dignity: The Quran emphasizes that all human beings are inherently worthy of respect because they have been given the capacity for reason and free will.
• Upholding justice: A just life, defined by equality and fairness, is a core characteristic of being on the "right" path. This includes striving for justice in all dealings. [1, 3, 6, 7, 8]

Key takeaways

• The concept of the "people of the right" is both a description of a state in the afterlife and a guide for behavior in this life.
• Living a righteous life involves actively fulfilling the rights of others and adhering to the principles of justice and respect for all human beings, as taught by the Quran. [1, 2, 3]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n79nCIgcpQ

[2] https://en.wikishia.net/view/People_of_the_Right_Hand

[3] https://www.islamicity.org/3657/human-rights-according-to-the-quran/

[4] https://www.dompetdhuafa.org/en/what-are-the-criteria-for-a-just-and-democratic-leader-in-islam/

[5] https://quranreflect.com/posts/35995?locale=ms

[6] https://www.newageislam.com/islam-human-rights/dr-mohammad-najeeb-qasmi-sambhali-new-age-islam/human-rights-light-quran-hadith/d/127588

[7] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381384615_The_Concept_of_Human_Rights_from_The_Qur'an_Perspective

[8] https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/examining-the-concept-of-justice-in-greek-philosophy-and-islam-a-comparative-analysis/

On Thursday 30 October, 2025 at 03:09:46 pm IST, Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam <> wrote:

Dear Dr. Ram Punyani, Reading the article shows once again on the name of Shiva is being used for hallucinating temples in his name at all places constructed by muslimeen and muslimaat for celebrating the glory of Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma whose grave exists in Hebron. Sharing this is most important for eradicating accursed entreprise of creating a fake identity in the name of secular word Hindu/Sindhu, a river through deification of cows which is blasphemous of Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma whose successor is the living kalki Shah Raheem al Hussaini Aga Khan V.

I have been sharing on the name of the living kalki Shah Raheem al Hussaini, the sanatan karta of vasudhaiv kutumbkum whose jaikara in part of the national anthem. Guru Tagore sang jaikara for the adhinayak  of the  8.25+ family of Adam AS and Hawwa AS. He should have pledged to the living kalki of his age at the seat of prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS ,prophet Abraham known as Guru Brahmma since all awaiting kalki /the imam e zamana/ adhinayak, the bharat, the light of Allah will be the people of Right post allegiance to the living kalki , the imam e zamana post allegiance and obedience of the the living kalki whom muslimeen and muslimaat salute from across the masjids . This needs to be shared with all whom you described as 'Hindu Right'. 

In the name of secular perspective, you are describing the accursed enemies of Babri masjid as the Hindu Right. This is wrong since muslimeen and muslimaat are saluting the living kalki and thus people of Right are the muslimeen and muslimaat pledged to living kalki ,the imam e zamana, the adhinayak, the bharat. Please note this instead of using the word Right  for any other group invoking any other label.  

muslimeen and muslimaat pledged to the living successor of the Adam AS, the first muslim khalifatullah are the people of Right Hand as those in allegiance to the Hand of Allah referred to in verse 48:10 of the holy Qur'aan. Please focus on learning this instead of presenting your accursed ignorance in the name of being secular Hindu. 

I have written the above for describing the accursed duryodhans of our age as real time duryodhans who delude to rule in the name of being Hindu for destruction of sanatan dharma which is the call of Allah in verse 3:103 of the holy Qur'aan. RSS speaks about sanatan dharma and there are many handles now presenting themselves as SATYA SANATAN . So, these need to be educated on the identity of the SATYA SANATAN KALKI SHAH RAHEEM al Hussaini Aga Khan V through whom we need to pray to Allah.

Among the muslimeen and muslimaat as well, we are witnessing the play of absence of allegiance to the living imam e zamana, the kalki whom all salute but only 20 millions are pledged to the living kalki/imam e zamana for the obedience of Allah. I am showing the obedience protocol of verse 4:59 which is the call for obedience of Allah through obedience of the messenger of Allah and his successor. 

Gyan yog is about knowing the name of the living successor of prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS for all who have been marrying in the name of Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma whose successor is the living kalki Shah Raheem al Hussaini Aga Khan V. Thus, real time yogies are only muslimeen and muslimaat who are pledged to the living kalki Shah Raheem al Hussaini Aga Khan V.

Thus, all in BJP and RSS and all those suffering from the ignorance of the unbroken chain of the living kalki at the seat of Adam AS need to be educated for entrance into the luminous circle of the souls in allegiance to the living kalki. This is the call for all parties contesting elections for being people's representative at all levels. 

I am proposing the dawn of the luminous democracy in allegiance to the living successor of the rasoolullah.

I am delighted for your article which denounces the writings of P.N.Oak which are based on the ignorance of the living successor of Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma. I have examined all the diagnostic and prescriptive propositions as a researcher in just world order inquiries for finding out the real meaning of the call of Allah for all in verse 3:103 which is first part is referred to as sanatan dharma.

Conclusion:

muslimeen and muslimaat are 100 per cent sanatan dharmik in allegiance to the living kalki and thus we need to celebrate the muslim rulers in allegiance to the living kalki.

Emperor Shahabuddin Mohammad Shahjahan obeyed the leaders in the posterity of prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS whose bloodline connect to Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma through prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS. This is the reason, mughal time pesh imams are from the line of prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS. 

In Delhi, there are fake imams like Umar Ilyasi who claim to be leader of the pesh imams of masjids all over India and there are some describing Saad Kandhlavi as the Ameer of Ummat e muslimeen wo muslimaat. These need to educated for pledging allegiance to the living successor of rasoolullah at the seat of Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma.  We are witnessing terrorist activities of Jains in the name of Hindutva as this was witnessed in Bengal where they tried to ban sale of fish and meat.

We are witness to the play of hatred for muslimeen and muslimaat in general in the name of Shiva on the occasion of kumbh mela. All these activities shows that we need to share the name of the living successor of Imam Abraham known as Guru Brahmma for uniting the vasudhaiv kutumbkum which India declared on the occasion of G-20 summit. This require curriculum renewal since RSS guys are promoting accursed terror of Jains for destruction of India. At the same time, we need to educate Tableeghi jamaat leaders who are promoting hatred for visiting the masouleum of the luminous leaders in the posterity of prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS and presenting themselves in the name of Allah and prophet Mohammad SUH and HRS. These are impostors/dajjals. Speaking against interest/faida/sood, they are are preventing muslimeen and muslimaat from among the Sunni social background to engage with the the leaders in banking and finance. Here, we are witnessing some translators who are using the word interest/sood/faida and usury as being the same which is not the same since the word USURY is clearly defined as rates doubled and multiplied.  https://quran.com/ali-imran/130

Dr Muhammad Mukhtar Alam,  Cognitive Clinical Psychologist,  and Development Professional | Advocating for the Unity of 7.97 billion souls in allegiance to 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah Mowlana Kareem Shah Al Hussaini post debates on the academic conclusions on the sole thesis on the reference to Lord Ramachandra's vasudhaiv kutumbkum declaration referred in the Congress Manifesto of 1989.|

Founders of  Mushkil Kusha Mental Health Rehabilitation Private (2016), Abrahamic/Brahminical Quartet/Octet Unity Centre (2020), Movement for Transition to Post Fossil Fuel Age Green India (2008) , Ecostrategic Communicators for Low Carbon Leisure (2009),  Indian Muslim Economic Development Agency (2010) , Center for Ecological Audit,Social Inclusion and Governance (2003), Sarva Gunwatta Abhiyan (2017), National Campaign for Nutrition for Dignity (2014), Campaign Against Child Labour (1995), Campaign Against Child Trafficking,(2000)  International Youth for Humanity  (1989). Professional Work Locations include the current Deshkal Society, Sufi Trust and earlier Terre Des Hommes(Germany) India Programme, Save the Children,UK (India), Development Alternatives, HPSPP, Department of Education, Government of Haryana, Deshkal Society, Centre for Alternative Dalit Media, Centre for Agriculture and Rural Development,  Institute of Agribusiness Management.

Papers and Presentations at http://slideshare.net/mukhtaralam

On Thursday 30 October, 2025 at 07:56:27 am IST, Dr Ram Puniyani <> wrote:

Taj Mahal: Motivated Controversies being Raised yet Again

 Ram Puniyani

 Taj Mahal, regarded as one of the seven wonders of the World, is one of the major markers for India on the World map. It is a poem on marble; Guru Rabindranath Tagore described it as ‘drop of tear on the cheek of time’. Its beauty and fascination as a symbol of love is remarkable. It is a UNESCO heritage site and is maintained by the Archeological Survey of India. It is a marvel on marble and its replicas were given as the gift to the visiting heads of state.

Since it was constructed by Mughal ruler Shahjahan in memory of his wife Mumtaj Mahal, it has been an eyesore to the Hindu right wing. Though its history has been settled by the Archaeological Survey of India and even the Culture Minister Mahesh Sharma said that it was not Shiv Temple, in 2017, during the Modi regime. The controversies are deliberately raised to boost the communal divides by the right-wing leaders and ideologues, time and over again. Even ASI has time and again clarified it being a mausoleum and not a temple.

The first major controversy around it was created with Yogi Adityanath becoming the Chief Minister of UP. His tourism department published a booklet about sites of tourist attraction in UP. This booklet did not mention Taj as one of the sites of tourist attraction, despite nearly 12000 visitors being attracted to this marvel on a daily basis. It attracts 23% of tourists to India. When questioned he retaliated that Taj does not reflect Indian Culture.

Now another film by Paresh Raval is coming. Its trailer shows that as its dome is lifted Lord Shiva appears. The forthcoming film ‘The Taj Story’ as it appears from its trailers is an attempt to propagate the Taj as Tejo Mahalay, which was converted into a tomb by Shahjahan.

The argument of the forthcoming film  is that Taj was a Hindu temple, Shiv Temple, Tejo Mahalay, built in 4^th Century (Later revised to say 11^th Century) and converted into a Mausoleum by Mughal ruler Shahjahan. It being 4^th century temple was put forward by a lawyer P.N. Oak. Historian Ruchika Sharma rubbishes Oak on the basis of Historical evidence, “But Oak, who did not know Farsi perhaps missed this vital detail that rubbishes his theory of the Taj being a reused 4th century palace. Historians such as Giles Tillotson also challenged Oak’s theory by asserting that the “technical know-how to create a building with the structural form of the Taj simply did not exist in pre-Mughal India”. The mystery of 21 empty rooms at bottom was also clarified by ASI. Architecturally it was to give stability to the structure and they are empty rooms, and used for maintenance purposes. This was clarified during the Modi regime itself.

Once the 4^th century theory did not work P.N.Oak revised it to say that it was a 12^th century temple. Sharma continues “Yet, Oak armed himself with make-believe and propaganda and petitioned the Supreme Court of India in July 2000, that the Taj was constructed by Raja Paramar Dev’s chief minister Salakshan in the 12th century and was therefore a Hindu structure “Tejo Mahalaya” and not made by Mughals.

Oak went up to the Supreme Court to make his point, the highest court rebuffed his fantasy bereft of historical evidence. His major argument was related to architectural aspects of the tomb. The dome at top, the inverted lotus at the top and the 21 empty  rooms at the bottom. Similarly, later one Amarnath Mishra approached the Allahabad High Court to petition that this was built by Chandela King Parmadi, this was also dismissed by the court in 2005)

There are detailed accounts available about the construction of Taj which are from immaculate historical sources. Peter Mundy and Tavernier, two travelers, mention that during their visit to India they came to know of Shahjahan’s grief and his determination to build a grand structure in memory of his wife, Mumtaj Mahal. Shahjahan made grand plans by involving the architects, the chief one being a Muslims (Ustad Ahmad Lahori) and his major associate being a Hindu architect. Badshah Nama the biography of Shahjahan gives a detailed account of the whole process. The group of people put together to plan and execute it.

The land chosen for Taj had belonged to Raja Jaisingh. There are two versions of the process of acquiring this. One says that it was procured by giving due compensation, the other mentioning that Raja Jaisingh gifted it to the emperor as they were on friendly terms. The architecture of Taj is a great reflection of the syncretic traditions which prevailed here. The double dome structures were introduced by Mughal architects, Lal Kila (Red fort) and Humayun’s tomb  being another example of this. These Hindu Temples had the triangular superstructures. Later domes were also introduced in temples. Architecture is not an exclusive process and the mixture of architectural styles is part of the process of civilizations.

The twenty thousand artisans were hired. As the Mughal administration used to have a construction division, the marvelous structures of North India are not a flash in the pan. Somehow the rumor is making rounds that the hands of these workers were cut. There is no source to substantiate this in any way. The account books and documents of Shahjahan’s time amply tell us the detailed accounts of expenditure done to build the Taj. The account books mention the amounts spent to buy marble from Makrana and wages paid to the workers. Some prevalent Hindu motifs were made part of the structure as Hindu architects and workers were part of the process of construction.

In a lighter vein one should mention P.N. Oaks fertile and banal imagination which puts the whole World civilization having roots in Hindu culture. For him Christianity is Krishna Niti; Vatican comes from Vatika and Rome from Ram! Despite his things based on such superficiality devoid of any historical evidence, he kept publishing books and small booklets which were circulated in RSS shakhas to propagate his theories to become part of social understanding.

Most of the points raised by film (as shown in the trailers) on Taj Mahal were clarified a decade ago, still the idea of reviving all this is a political one as it helps the Hindu nationalist agenda of spreading hate against Mughal rulers and thereby reflected on today's Muslims.

This film is yet another propaganda film in the series of Kashmir Files, Bengal Files, Kerala Story and so many like these whose aim is to intensify right-wing propaganda. This film adds on to that and will be yet another tool for the divisiveness and hate ruling roost in contemporary India.

--

 

 

--

Regards,

Ram Puniyani

Youtube Facebook Instagram Whatsapp

Twitter Pinterest My Website

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Secular Perspective" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to secularperspective+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/secularperspective/CAKa3rYEn-HYJb-f4zq9JDnL8y5jNVv51tJCe3WY-%3D97eznzbKg%40mail.gmail.com.