100 percent ISLAMIC in allegiance to 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah Only: Prohibition of Homosexuality is Common Across the Faiths in the House of Adam AS, the first Muslim Khalifatullah

Hello all, I have explained on the word Islamic/Islamist in real sense of the word in our age. 100 percent ISLAMIC in allegiance to 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah Only: Prohibition of Homosexuality is Common Across the Faiths in the House of Adam AS, the first Muslim Khalifatullah. None should be called either JIHADI or ISLAMIST unless s/he pledged to 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah Mowlana Kareem Shah Al Hussaini. All muslims and muslimas pledged to 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah are referred as Ismailies and from among them those pledged to 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah are referred to as Nizari muslims and muslimas as well. *** Hello Dr. James Dorsey, Please consider making sense of the words such as ISLAMIST and JIHADI since all pledged to the 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah are 100 per ISLAMIC only. The word Jihad is faith neutral word as this word refers to your communication as well as JIHADI for LGBTQ+ inclusion . Are churches open for LGBTQ? Which churches are open and which synagogues are promoting accursed homosexuality? The gender identity challenge of those having problems with genital organs is a clear case. Lesbians and Gays are subject to marriage which is decreed as a solemn covenant between a man and a woman. Surat Al-Fath [48:10] - The Noble Qur'an - القرآن الكريم Surat Al-Fath [48:10] - The Noble Qur'an - القرآن الكريم Surat Al-Fath [verse 10] - Indeed, those who pledge allegiance to you, [O Muhammad] - they are actu... Noting down the commons from across the scriptures and societies,I call for the luminous rehabilitation of misguided men and women from among the people of divinely chosen. https://www.slideshare.net/mukhtaralam/against-adoption-of-homosexuality-and-for-defending-the-institution-of-family-letter-to-chief-justice-supreme-court-india-new-delhi EmojiDr Muhammad Mukhtar Alam, Cognitive Clinical Psychologist, and Development Professional | Advocating for the Unity of 7.97 billion souls in allegiance to 49th Imam and Fatemi Khalifatullah Mowlana Kareem Shah Al Hussaini post debates on the academic conclusions on the sole thesis on the reference to Lord Ramachandra's vasudhaiv kutumbkum declaration referred in the Congress Manifesto of 1989.| Founders of Mushkil Kusha Mental Health Rehabilitation Private (2016), Abrahamic/Brahminical Quartet/Octet Unity Centre (2020), Movement for Transition to Post Fossil Fuel Age Green India (2008) , Ecostrategic Communicators for Low Carbon Leisure (2009), Indian Muslim Economic Development Agency (2010) , Center for Ecological Audit,Social Inclusion and Governance (2003), Sarva Gunwatta Abhiyan (2017), National Campaign for Nutrition for Dignity (2014), Campaign Against Child Labour (1995), Campaign Against Child Trafficking,(2000) International Youth for Humanity (1989). Professional Work Locations include the current Deshkal Society, Sufi Trust and earlier Terre Des Hommes(Germany) India Programme, Save the Children,UK (India), Development Alternatives, HPSPP, Department of Education, Government of Haryana, Deshkal Society, Centre for Alternative Dalit Media, Centre for Agriculture and Rural Development, Institute of Agribusiness Management. Papers and Presentations at http://slideshare.net/mukhtaralam Mobile and WhatsApp: 8368616539 On Tuesday, 11 October, 2022 at 09:03:01 pm IST, James M. Dorsey from The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer <> wrote: Open in browser The World Cup: A Mixed Blessing for Qatari Soft Power James M. Dorsey Oct 11 ▷ LISTEN SAVE This open access article was published by the Middle East Journal The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid Review Article by James M. Dorsey Qatar and the 2022 FIFA World Cup: Politics, Controversy, Change, by Paul Michael Brannagan and Danyel Reiche. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. 186 pages.$49.99 cloth; $39.99 e-book. The glass should have been more than half full rather than half empty. But, with a little help from its friends, Qatar has proven to be its own worst enemy in the court of public opinion. Qatari “soft power” setbacks loom large despite the United States’ praise for the Gulf state’s help in the bungled US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 and its willingness to work with Europe to help the continent wean itself off Russian energy. Qatar’s ability to mitigate the impact of an almost four-year-long economic and diplomatic boycott led by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia further garnered it sympathy as the underdog, especially because acceptance of the two states’ demands would have stripped it of its sovereignty.[1] Moreover, Qatar has taken significant steps to address the concerns of human rights and labor organizations, even though it has yet to meet international standards, and enforcement problems remain. The country has liberalized its kafala labor regime, which left the foreign workers who constitute most of the population at the mercy of their employers; introduced the region’s first minimum income wage; enhanced workers’ rights; and improved working conditions. Nevertheless, worker, gender, and human rights, together with alleged Qatari ties to Islamists and jihadists, have continued to dominate media reporting in the final stretch leading up to the 2022 World Cup in Doha. The reporting is the result of an explosive mix: legitimate concerns and demands put forward by human rights groups that see the final sprint as an opportunity to advance them; a greater willingness by Qatari and conservative Muslim athletes and sports entities to push back against liberal concerns — particularly the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual communities (LGBTQ+) — laid bare by Qatar’s hosting of the World Cup; Qatar’s failure to put the horse in front of the cart in anticipating and responding to concerns such as hotel access for LGBTQ+ fans; and continued, primarily Emirati, effort to covertly muddy Qatar’s water through a well-funded media and influence campaign that sought to exacerbate the Gulf state’s dilemmas.[2] To read further, please download the open access article at https://doi.org/10.3751/76.2.30. [1] Frida Ghitis, “Qatar Has Officially Come Back in from the Cold,” World Politics Review, February 3, 2022, www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/30295. [2] . David D. Kirkpatrick and Sheera Frenkel, “Hacking in Qatar Highlights a Shift toward Espionage-for-Hire,” New York Times, June 8, 2017, https://nyti.ms/3NtO32i; Ryan Grim and Brian Walsh, “Leaked Documents Expose Stunning Plan to Wage Financial War on Qatar — and Steal the World Cup,” The Intercept, November 8, 2017, https://interc.pt/2AvXkl1